Federal officials re-approve state’s plan for changes in Medicaid; gradual rollout could start April 1, but more litigation looks likely
Gov. Matt Bevin welcomed President Trump to Lexington on Oct. 13. (Photo by James Crisp for the Courier Journal)
—
By Al Cross
Kentucky Health News
Federal health officials have again approved Gov. Matt Bevin’s plan to revamp the state Medicaid program by introducing work requirements, premiums, co-payments and other changes for “able-bodied” members who weren’t covered until then-Gov. Steve Beshear expanded the program in 2014.
The previous version of the plan was blocked in late June by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., who said the officials had not dealt with the state’s projection that the changes would leave the Medicaid rolls with 95,000 fewer members in five years than they would have without the changes.
District Judge James Boasberg said the officials “never adequately considered whether” the plan “would in fact help the state furnish medical assistance to its citizens, a central objective of Medicaid.” Now he is likely to hear more arguments from state and federal officials and lawyers for the 16 Kentuckians who filed the lawsuit. Just what will be litigated remains unclear; the language of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services approval is likely to be a major point.
CMS said in a news release that the state could begin rolling out the program regionally no earlier than April 1, the state Cabinet for Health and Family Services said in a news release. The state calls the plan Kentucky HEALTH, for “Helping to Engage and Achieve Long Term Health.” It would operate under an administrative waiver of normal Medicaid rules, and after more than a year of debate is often called “the waiver.”
“Reapproving a waiver that makes hard-working Kentuckians jump through hoops to keep their coverage will no doubt have the opposite effect,” said Emily Beauregard, executive director of Kentucky Voices for Health, a coalition of interest groups. “Kentucky’s historic gains in health coverage have led to real progress in our economic recovery and our health – especially in struggling rural areas – and CMS’s decision today turns the clock back on those gains.”
Deborah Yetter of the Louisville Courier Journal notes that CMS’s decision “comes as advocates have expressed increasing concern about the impact in Arkansas, which introduced work requirements earlier this year and has seen thousands cut off Medicaid enrollment as a result.” Boasberg is also hearing a case challenging the Arkansas plan.
Other stakeholders were more equivocal. Terry Brooks, executive director of Kentucky Youth Advocates, said in a release, “When it comes to this – or any policy – our question is always the same – ‘Is it good for kids?” And the key to this significant policy change’s success or failure lies in its implementation. Kentucky HEALTH’s initial rollout and ongoing management must be family-centric.” While the plan doesn’t have new rules for children, pregnant women, and transition-aged youth in foster care, he said, research shows that insured parents are likelier to have insured children.
This story may be updated.